HI! i wrote tho the FSF about the non-licenced files in the kernel. They answer me we can consider that files under the same licence of the kernel (gpl_v2).
this is their reply: >Unless you have some reason to believe otherwise, it is fair to assume >that files in a project that do not have an explicit license header have >the same license as the project itself. So, when you encounter files in >the kernel Linux that don't have license headers, you should treat them >as if they were released under GPLv2 only. > >If you have further questions, please feel free to contact us. > >Best regards > _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
