Two notes:

First, there is no notice of license. The comment regarding "forced
extraction" is merely a code comment. It doesn't place any burden on
the user for distributing or using the software.

Secondly, regarding reverse engineering being illegal in some places...

So is including patented code. :) Since we can't bend to every
nation's laws (no manpower plus this would essentially mean ALL
software would be unusable) I say unless it's prosecuted it's
irrelevant.

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Chris Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco,
>
>  I'm guessing it means HPT370 support was derived by
>  reverse-engineering.  I believe this may be illegal in some countries.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Chris.
>
>
>
>  On 11/03/2008, crap0101 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > hi!,
>  >  i've a doubt about a licence, if you please look at this link
>  >  http://wiki.gnewsense.org/HardyKernelLinux-2-6-24DriversIdePci-hpt366/C
>  >
>  >  i would ask you what mean "Note that final HPT370 support was done by
>  >  force extraction of GPL." ??
>  >
>  >
>  >  thank,
>  >  marco
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  _______________________________________________
>  >  gNewSense-users mailing list
>  >  [email protected]
>  >  http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
>  >
>
>
>  --
>  Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux:
>
>  http://www.getgnulinux.org/
>
>  A great GNU/Linux distro:
>
>  http://wiki.gnewsense.org/
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  gNewSense-users mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
>


_______________________________________________
gNewSense-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users

Reply via email to