>That is the better case, the others i found is that they have
no >licence
>at all.
Same week ago, i'd wrote to the FSF for clarification about it. If some
files (and there are many files like that) had no licence, we can assume
is under GPL V2, like the kernel itself. Is the same for the files
reporting "GNU GPL" only.
for the FSF's answer, see:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-users/2008-02/msg00169.html
_______________________________________________
gNewSense-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
