> > okay. more questions. > > --if the code's license is GPL, but the code include something like > somewhere/foobar.c (or foobar.o), does the license of foobar.c affect > the freedom of the code (assuming foobar.c isnt GPL)? > It has to be determined in an individual basis: - The GPL requires foobar.c to be under a compatible license.[1] If it's under an incompatible one, there is a violation of such license and of the GPL. - If there is no license, it's safe to assume it's GPL. - If there is *only* foobar.o (object code, without source) it's non-free by definition.
> - i am currently editing via kfv emacs. downloaded the > linux-ubuntu-module, i found the the default url link to on line wiki > is incorrect, so i changed it. is that okay? i hope i dont mess any > thing > > -- > excuse my english... > Sorry, I don't use kfv.el, maybe somebody on the list could help you. I'm sending it to the list. [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatDoesCompatMean Iván _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
