On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 21:42 +0200, Sam Geeraerts wrote: > Karl Goetz wrote: > >> BTW, regarding non-free documentation, while Ubuntu may already filter > >> it out, should we not be more explicit in rejecting it? (Maybe I am > >> not acquainted enough with the gNS web sites.) > > > > I belive the aim of gNS is 100% *FSF* free (as oposed to DFSG free). As > > such the doco moved by upstream(s) into non-free categories may actually > > be free for our purposes. > > kk > > > > True. The same goes for artwork (game data comes to mind). But I think > we still want to encourage (more) freedom for those things. I don't know > how we should do that, but that's probably a discussion for another > time, since it's not on our list of priorities.
I agree (both about more freedom being good, and discussing it another time) kk -- Karl Goetz, Debian user / Ubuntu contributor / gNewSense contributor http://www.kgoetz.id.au
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
