On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 07:11 +0100, Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix - wrote: > Ted Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:05:01 +0000 > >> Eric Morey <e...@glodime.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I found this post and comments on Vrms to interesting: > >>> http://blog.nizarus.org/2009/09/are-you-a-100-free-user > >>> > >>> Eric... > > > nice one ted > > > > RMS would certainly not agree with (much of) this output. > > some guy called ompaul made a comment about it on the web page pointing > out that we kind of IGNORE IT COMPLETELY but it seems he was wrong.. ;-) > > MOST of us ignore it. ;-) > Actually, there's a long history (going back to Gobuntu) of trying to reform VRMS. It's never really taken off.
All it would take is a small bit of ubuntu-ization to make the behavior correct in Ubuntu (which uses the FSF designation of freedom) and gNewSense. Nobody wants to write the perl code, I guess. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list gNewSense-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
