is on its way. b
> Thanks for following up on this. > Do they say which version of LPPL they're going to use? Both 1.2 and 1.3a are > free software licenses, but according to the FSF license list [1] 1.2 can > have additional restrictions that make some files non-free. > Would they agree to retroactively add the same license to (recent) earlier > versions (including the one in gNS 2.x), so that those versions become > dual-licensed? Even just a short public statement that's not (necessarily) > legally binding would make me much more comfortable about keeping the package > in gNS. -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list gNewSense-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
