Interesting I also like the change, since i don't know what would happen with Ubuntu if Canonical takes other desicions (i'm a newbie and don't know very much about this)
I think there is no need for gNewSense to support so many arquitectures i tried Debian Lenny and it is too complicated for non experts, it amazes me that the development group is less than five salud!! On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:00 AM, <gnewsense-users-requ...@nongnu.org>wrote: > Send gNewSense-users mailing list submissions to > gnewsense-users@nongnu.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > gnewsense-users-requ...@nongnu.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > gnewsense-users-ow...@nongnu.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of gNewSense-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu? > (Niklas Cholmkvist) > 2. Re: Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu? > (davide89v) > 3. Re: Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu? > (Jason Self) > 4. Re: Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu? > (aurele) > 5. Re: Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu? > (Karl Goetz) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:25:21 +0200 > From: Niklas Cholmkvist <towards...@gmail.com> > Subject: [gNewSense-users] Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian > instead of Ubuntu? > To: gNS users list <gnewsense-users@nongnu.org> > Message-ID: > <913eb7e40911130125x467a7a51l90c70c32e6701...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > > I read the faq at http://www.gnewsense.org/index.php?n=FAQ.FAQ#toc13 . > Why is gNewSense 3.0 going to be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu? > Are there ethical as well as technical reasons, or only ethical? I'm > interested to know. > > Cheers > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:50:48 +0100 > From: davide89v <davide...@riseup.net> > Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian > instead of Ubuntu? > To: Niklas Cholmkvist <towards...@gmail.com> > Cc: gNS users list <gnewsense-users@nongnu.org> > Message-ID: <1258123848.6367.4.ca...@davide89v-desktop> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Because Ubuntu run only in i386, Debian in 21 different architectures :) > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:26:08 -0800 > From: Jason Self <jason.s...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian > instead of Ubuntu? > To: Gnewsense <gnewsense-users@nongnu.org> > Message-ID: <be238382-32fd-43c6-a47c-8cd37715c...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; > delsp=yes > > On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist <towards...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Why is gNewSense 3.0 going to be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu? > > I am quite happy about the change, but would also like to know why. > Just speculating, but I suppose that there may be multiple reasons. > > On Nov 13, 2009, at 6:50 AM, davide89v <davide...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > Because Ubuntu run only in i386, Debian in 21 different > > architectures :) > > Ubuntu also supports AMD64, but gNewSense never did. So it seems to > follow that just because Debian supports 21 different architectures it > does not necessarily follow that gNewSense must, or will. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:46:39 -0500 > From: aurele <ice.c...@gmx.com> > Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian > instead of Ubuntu? > To: gNewSense - Users <gnewsense-users@nongnu.org> > Message-ID: <1258127200.6124.5.ca...@bob> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > > Well Ubuntu works on Mac (old architecture) too. > > But as gNS stay Free like Freedom ;) > And if it can protect our privacy too ... > > -- aurele > > "Comment une Société sans morale, ni éthique, peu se prévaloir de > vouloir les enseigner ?" > > > On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 07:26 -0800, Jason Self wrote: > > On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist <towards...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Why is gNewSense 3.0 going to be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu? > > > > I am quite happy about the change, but would also like to know why. > > Just speculating, but I suppose that there may be multiple reasons. > > > > On Nov 13, 2009, at 6:50 AM, davide89v <davide...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > > > Because Ubuntu run only in i386, Debian in 21 different > > > architectures :) > > > > Ubuntu also supports AMD64, but gNewSense never did. So it seems to > > follow that just because Debian supports 21 different architectures it > > does not necessarily follow that gNewSense must, or will. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gNewSense-users mailing list > > gNewSense-users@nongnu.org > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:30:40 +1030 > From: Karl Goetz <k...@kgoetz.id.au> > Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] Will gNewSense 3.0 be based on Debian > instead of Ubuntu? > To: gnewsense-users@nongnu.org > Message-ID: <20091114023040.7de3b...@epicfail.kgoetz.id.au> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:26:08 -0800 > Jason Self <jason.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist > > <towards...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Why is gNewSense 3.0 going to be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu? > > > > I am quite happy about the change, but would also like to know why. > > Just speculating, but I suppose that there may be multiple reasons. > > Yup > > > On Nov 13, 2009, at 6:50 AM, davide89v <davide...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > > > Because Ubuntu run only in i386, Debian in 21 different > > > architectures :) > > > > Ubuntu also supports AMD64, but gNewSense never did. So it seems to > > My fault, I'll take the bullet for that one. > > > follow that just because Debian supports 21 different architectures > > it does not necessarily follow that gNewSense must, or will. > > Absolutely, there is no valid reason for us to try and support all > architectures supported by debian - with our current development group > (less then 5). > kk > > -- > Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) > Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer > http://www.kgoetz.id.au > No, I won't join your social networking group > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 197 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/gnewsense-users/attachments/20091114/5ffd9b81/signature.bin > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > gNewSense-users mailing list > gNewSense-users@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users > > > End of gNewSense-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 13 > *********************************************** > -- Gaspar
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list gNewSense-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
