On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:06:11 +0100 al3xu5 / dotcommon <dotcom...@autistici.org> wrote:
> The GPL and other free software licenses are focused just on the > software source code. > > So, for GPL (and FSF) does not matter if the artwork that comes > "attached" (not embedded) with the software code is or is not free. The only thing the FSF approves of restricting are works of opinion. They do advise in making artworks free. See their list of licenses for uses other than documentation or software, in particular the Free Art License. In my opinion, the GNU GPL is a valid license for digital art, since there are sources for creating these. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OtherLicenses -- Nicodemo _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list gNewSense-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
