On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:10:11 +0700 (WIT) "chika" <ch...@cs.its.ac.id> wrote:
> >> i'm a vim partisan > >> vim like an another religion for me > >> > >> why don't include full package of vim on the next release rather > >> than mini one? > >> > >> add me > > > > > > I do not want to trigger a flamwar but I think that is better to > > promote GNU Emacs than Vim because it is under GPLv3+, not a > > question of quality but of freedom :D > > > > am i trigger the war? i don't mean that... sorry > > afaik > en.wikipedia.com/vim > .... > Released under a software license compatible with the GNU General > Public License, Vim is free and open source software. The program's > license includes some charityware clauses, encouraging users who > enjoy the software to consider donating to children in Uganda.[4] > .... > > is it closed source?! He didn't talk about source availability. He talked about freedom. kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list gNewSense-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
