On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 15:24 +1000, Karl Goetz wrote: > On Sat, 07 May 2011 14:11:32 -0500 > Quiliro Ordóñez <quil...@congresolibre.org> wrote: > > > Thank you Michal and Michael. > > > > So this means Debian has still many packages that are nonfree besides > > the kernel that now is 100% free? > > The kernel no longer carries non-free firmware, but still does its > loads per normal. aiui this means it can't e considered equivalent to > linux-libre as it advertises proprietary software. > kk >
It seems to me that Debian is getting quite close to the case of OpenBSD, in which the default system install is free but recommends or provides instruction on installing non-free software. FSF does not recommend installing OpenBSD for this reason. _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list gNewSense-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
