On Sat Aug 31 19:20:38 2013 tryn...@hushmail.com wrote: > > On 08/30/2013 at 11:00 PM, "Karl Goetz" <k...@kgoetz.id.au> wrote: > > > > tryn...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > > Grsec/Pax are fully GNU, fully free, but to cut to the point, > > current > > > Debian leaders have no ear at all for this twin program solution > > > (Grsecurity is often used to mean the combination of the two. > > > > The grsec kernel patch (as packaged in Debian) is available in > > gNewSense repositories: > > http://archive.gnewsense.org/gnewsense- > > three/gnewsense/pool/main/l/linux-patch-grsecurity2/ > > > > That is an old out-of-reality misery apparently purposefully left there > for users' confusion. Yes, really yes: for users' confusion. > That is just one of the obstacles that, upon sincere insight, > can not be honest, unintentional errors. > > Here's what I posted months ago about such effective misleading of > newbies: > > http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=103302#p493867 > ("grsecurity install made difficult and misleading, why?") You seem convinced there is a conspiracy of malice being created to make grsec impossible to use and i really don't think i will be able to convince you otherwise. >From reading the thread its obvious you don't have the technical skills with >packaging to be building custom kernels (and were cutting corners or avoiding >reading all required docs) which undermine your conspiracy claims further. > > As a side note, referring to 'current Debian leaders' makes it > > sound like a recent conspiracy - the current arrangement is > > neither recent nor (from what i can see) a conspiracy. > > Lots of references, much of them often swiftly swept > under the carpet, that bias is there, aplenty, in the GNU/Linux world. > And to say bias is quite often understatement. (I cut the debian multimedia bit) thanks, kk _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list gNewSense-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users