As compared to the network that we sell aDSL off of, the VZ dsl offering is a total pain. Unexplained downtimes, packet loss, all things that VZ says are fine.
We attempting to move most of our dsl (both our own and VZ resold) to wireless. It's faster, we can provide better control, and most of all, we know what's going on with it.
Are you in Manchester? I wan't following the entire thread. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Errr, I send the wrong e-mail to the list :)
In a message dated: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:00:44 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Okay,
I don't know who is playing what games, but I wouldn't be surprised if Verizon is behind this!
2 weeks ago I checked with Earthlink, DSL Reports, and Verizon. All 3 locations stated I was within 9000 feet of the CO, and could order DSL service. This week, as I'm about to order, I went and checked,
and only Verizon is stating that I'm eligible for DSL.
Earthlink says that the problem seems to be that I can only get DSL at 384/384, and that they don't offer that speed. DLS Reports
doesn't provide a distance estimate this week, but does state that service is available from Covad and Network Access Solutions, and that Rhythyms is 'waiting'.
So, why would I be able to get DSL 2 weeks ago, and not this week?
Should I wait another week to see if this gets fixed, or just sign up with Verizon?
Anyone have any experience with Verizon for DSL? How bad is it? Should I just wait until Comcast comes through with broadband?
Maybe I'll just invest in 'Avian Carrier Networks' :)
_______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
