Ooppps that was $100 up front and $100/mo versus $600 upfront and $60 a month - same service, just one way is financing the equipment and installation.
On 9/9/04 10:37 AM, "Paul Lussier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:01:27 EDT > "Brian Riley (maillist)" said: > >> My download speeds are on the order of cable speeds and upload is slower but >> At least as good as most DSL. > > What's the latency like on that? I'm assuming with a 48K mile > round-trip minimum for every packet, latency must be rather high? > >> I paid 4100 up front and will pay $100/month for 15 months then $60/month. >> The alternative was $600 up front and $60 month ... Since I was paying $52 a >> month just for my second phone line, this price is fine by me ... > > What kind of service was the $600/$60 for? On pure dollar costs, that > seems the cheaper way to go. Did the $4100/$100/$60 get you a higher > quality of service? _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss