Jeff Kinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Have to agree though.  Isn't the gnhlug-discuss address is redundant
> with [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Unless there is some historical reason that the
> longer one is needed.

IIRC, the other day I subscribed Gmane to
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org because that is the address that the
footer told me to use.  So, at the very least, let's not completely
get rid of this.

--kevin
-- 
GnuPG ID: B280F24E                     And the madness of the crowd
alumni.unh.edu!kdc                     Is an epileptic fit
                                       -- Tom Waits
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss

Reply via email to