The last Fedora 3 I burned with your ISO's :)
> nice -10 cdrecord dev=0,0 -v -date ./image.iso
Not a far from what you are using there. The biggest
mistake I made was not checking the magic numbers
before assuming it was a good burn. I ran the media
check on the machine I intended to install them on
they checked out fine. Installed fine on 2-3 machines.
Michael Nolin
--- "Kevin D. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lately when I burn Fedora ISOs to CD I get a strange
> error. When I
> boot the disk I am offered the opportunity to do a
> media test. So, I
> run this test and it always fails, for all of the
> CDs.
>
> However, I have seen this exact test work with CDs
> burned by other
> people. Unfortunately, I don't know how they burned
> these CDs.
>
> So, what I am I doing wrong?
>
> Oh, by the way, my Fedora Core 4 disks, even though
> they failed the
> media check, still installed fine on one of my test
> boxes.
>
>
> System: 3Ghz Pentium 4, Fedora Core 1, the box
> itself is hardly doing
> anything. I've even tried buring at "speed=4" for
> laughs.
>
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] stentz-binary-i386]# nice -17 cdrecord -v
> -speed=16 -dev2,0,0 -data FC4-i386-disc1.iso
> Cdrecord-Clone 2.01a19 (i686-redhat-linux-gnu)
> Copyright (C) 1995-2003 J\x{FFFF}rg Schilling
> TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM
> scsidev: '2,0,0'
> scsibus: 2 target: 0 lun: 0
> Linux sg driver version: 3.1.25
> Using libscg version 'schily-0.7'
> cdrecord: Warning: using inofficial libscg transport
> code version (schily - Red
> Hat-scsi-linux-sg.c-1.75-RH '@(#)scsi-linux-sg.c
> 1.75 02/10/21 Copyright 1997 J. Schilling').
> SCSI buffer size: 64512
> atapi: 1
> Device type : Removable CD-ROM
> Version : 0
> Response Format: 2
> Capabilities :
> Vendor_info : '_NEC '
> Identifikation : 'DVD+RW ND-2100AD'
> Revision : '103D'
> Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-ROM.
> Current: 0x0009
> Profile: 0x001B
> Profile: 0x001A
> Profile: 0x0010
> Profile: 0x000A
> Profile: 0x0009 (current)
> Profile: 0x0008 (current)
> Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R/CD-RW driver
> (mmc_cdr).
> Driver flags : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE
> Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96R RAW/R96R
> Drive buf size : 1343488 = 1312 KB
> FIFO size : 4194304 = 4096 KB
> Track 01: data 634 MB
> Total size: 728 MB (72:12.28) = 324921 sectors
> Lout start: 729 MB (72:14/21) = 324921 sectors
> Current Secsize: 2048
> ATIP info from disk:
> Indicated writing power: 5
> Is not unrestricted
> Is not erasable
> Disk sub type: Medium Type B, low Beta category
> (B-) (4)
> ATIP start of lead in: -12369 (97:17/06)
> ATIP start of lead out: 359849 (79:59/74)
> Disk type: Short strategy type (Phthalocyanine or
> similar)
> Manuf. index: 69
> Manufacturer: Moser Baer India Limited
> Manufacturer is guessed because of the orange forum
> embargo.
> The orange forum likes to get money for recent
> information.
> The information for this media may not be correct.
> Blocks total: 359849 Blocks current: 359849 Blocks
> remaining: 34928
> Starting to write CD/DVD at speed 16 in real TAO
> mode for single session.
> Last chance to quit, starting real write 0
> seconds. Operation starts.
> Waiting for reader process to fill input buffer ...
> input buffer ready.
> BURN-Free is OFF.
> Performing OPC...
> Starting new track at sector: 0
> Track 01: 634 of 634 MB written (fifo 100%) [buf
> 100%] 16.3x.
> Track 01: Total bytes read/written:
> 665434112/665434112 (324919 sectors).
> Writing time: 279.498s
> Average write speed 15.8x.
> Min drive buffer fill was 100%
> Fixating...
> Fixating time: 23.896s
> cdrecord: fifo had 10482 puts and 10482 gets.
> cdrecord: fifo was 0 times empty and 8877 times
> full, min fill was 4%.
>
>
> Any ideas would be appreciated,
>
> --kevin
> --
> GnuPG ID: B280F24E And the
> madness of the crowd
> alumni.unh.edu!kdc Is an
> epileptic fit
> -- Tom Waits
> _______________________________________________
> gnhlug-discuss mailing list
> gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
>
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
