William D Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On 1/10/06, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > perl -ne 'split ","; $_ = $_[2]; s/(^")|("$)//g; print if m/univ/;' <
>> > > abc.txt > def.txt
>> > Egads!
[outstanding explanation I didn't have time to write myself removed ]
> None of this is seriously obfuscatory golfing, but if someone wanted to
> say darn the cost of forking new processes off bash, 'awk/cut|grep|sed'
> is easier to read, well, I won't argue that it's easier for him/her
> to read, and they should do it that way -- unless they need to tune
> for performance.
I would, however, offer that if someone were to find
'awk/cut|grep|sed' easier to read, then that person a) wouldn't have
asked this question ;) and b) would certainly benefit from learning
perl for those times when "the cost of forking new processes off bash"
can't be ignored for some reason :) Additionally, perl offers the
benefit of a debugger which can be immensely helpful for even simple
"one liner" tasks.
--
Seeya,
Paul
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
