On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:26:59AM -0500, Jeff Kinz wrote: > Chris, yes, the toppers ordinarily don't have confidential info on them. > They are usually just a delivery list, nothing wrong with having toppers. > > In this case, the "toppers" were printed on recycled paper which > had the confidential info on the "previously used" side of the paper.
I understand that, but the problem is not in using recycled paper for toppers -- that is neither an image problem nor any other kind of issue, and assuming proper treatment of confidential material (which is definitely *not* the case here) is actually good business. My point was that using recycled paper for these kind of things is not a bad thing. The problem is only in the fact that a list of credit card numbers was recycled at all: heck, I try not to do that without at least ripping the stuff up in my *home* recycling, much less when I've got a list of thousands of them. -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
