Travis Roy wrote: > >> Its clear that one never "really" knows how recycled materials are going >> to be used so confidential materials must always be destroyed rather >> than recycled. (duh) > > > Very true, most stuff being sent out to be "recycled" tends to end up > in the trash anyway: > This confusion arises from people misusing terminology. What the Globe did was not "recycling" it was "reusing". Anything confidential should not be placed in a recycling bin, it should be placed in a shredder.
I spent four years working in a credit union, where proper waste paper handling was crucial. If anyone is interested in my full opinion on this matter, contact me off list, as I'll spare everyone a lengthy rant. -Heather _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
