Dana Nowell <dananow...@cornerstonesoftware.com> wrote on 09/10/2009 05:06:24 PM:
> Bruce/Ben, > I've some experience with binary oriented endian issues on about 15 > different platforms (Sun, SGI, Intel/AMD Windows PCs, Tandem/Compaq/HP > NonStop 'mainframes', HP UX workstations, Linux, DEC Unix, and several > flavors of Unix that probably do not still exist). Basically INT signed > or unsigned byte swaps (hton/ntoh for 32 bit and custom for 64 bit) have > always worked as far back as I can remember (about 15 years). Float and > doubles are ALWAYS a pain as different, non endian related, format > standards exist. > > I assume since this is up for debate, that this is a homegrown protocol > and there is no defined and documented 'network standard' format. The > simplest and most obvious answer is pick one (which you seem to be > trying to do). Which one is a bit more complex as this long winded post > will hopefully show. > Thanks for your well thought out post. I think my standard is simple. Integers are converted to big-endian. Floats/doubles are converted to IEEE-754-2008 format and then converted to network format. I'm not trying to make a career of this, just something that works well enough so I can get my job done. A bonus is if it is a wee bit portable. The development tools on PC's are way better than on the Cell. <snip> > It appears you dislike suggestions of 'use ASCII' as they are space > inefficient but yet you seem to want a 'standard'. Well my experience > tells me that the new 'standard' is ASCII/XML, the old 'standard' is > something along the lines of IEEE 754 <snip> IEEE-754 is more than good enough. I do find it hard to believe for engineering heavy work that the standard is ASCII... > > Good luck. > > I'll need it :) Thanks! Bruce ****************************** Neither the footer nor anything else in this E-mail is intended to or constitutes an <br>electronic signature and/or legally binding agreement in the absence of an <br>express statement or Autoliv policy and/or procedure to the contrary.<br>This E-mail and any attachments hereto are Autoliv property and may contain legally <br>privileged, confidential and/or proprietary information.<br>The recipient of this E-mail is prohibited from distributing, copying, forwarding or in any way <br>disseminating any material contained within this E-mail without prior written <br>permission from the author. If you receive this E-mail in error, please <br>immediately notify the author and delete this E-mail. Autoliv disclaims all <br>responsibility and liability for the consequences of any person who fails to <br>abide by the terms herein. <br> ****************************** _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/