On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Ben Scott <dragonh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tom Buskey <t...@buskey.name> wrote: > > Or am I missing something? > > The thing you're all missing is that the system is *designed* not to > let you record content. You keep expecting to find a way to capture > content where it would make sense to have one. There isn't one, > because the copyright cartels don't *want* you to have one. > Except when it's designed to not let you record content, but not enforced. Which seems to be the case for Comcast's basic and extended basic channels right now in our area. It's unencrypted QAM... so record away. Granted, as Jarod mentioned, that may change in the future. :)
_______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
