"Ken D'Ambrosio" <k...@jots.org> writes:
>
> Brian: I'm gonna pull the whole repo. I really like btrfs, and anything
> pre-10.10 isn't recent enough to support it for an installation. And I ain't
> doing 12.04 because, well, it ain't the epitome of the Linux user experience.
> ;-)
Ken,
Have you considered upgrading to Debian 6.0/Squeeze? It really sounds
more like what you want...:
http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110205a
I use the same Compiz/GNOME setup as you're describing. I don't use btrfs,
but it looks like it went into this release.
--
"Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr))))."
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:29:23 -0400 "Michael ODonnell"
> <michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote
>
> > BTW, for recent kernel sources I think the value you wanted to
> > use for ARCH is i686 rather than i386, even though the latter
> > may be what the "arch" command reports.
>
> Well... here's my /usr/src/linux/arch directory:
>
> alpha c6x hexagon m68k openrisc score um xtensa
> arm cris ia64 microblaze parisc sh unicore32
> avr32 frv Kconfig mips powerpc sparc x86
> blackfin h8300 m32r mn10300 s390 tile x86_64
>
> Am I missing something obvious? Did I not need to name my destination
> architecture something from that directory?
>
> -Ken
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
