On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Michael ODonnell < michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > >> there may be a use for that WRT54GL of mine with > >> the blown WAN port. (mod - you had one too, right?) > > > >Yah, the WAN port on mine failed, as well. > > Hey, wait a minute! ;-> I think the one you have *IS* > my old one - I offered it on this channel back in 2009 > after the WAN port failed and didn't you claim it? > No. I think that I asked for it, but I was too late. I have two of my own, one of which had been flashed with White Russian (I think) and put in service, until the WAN port failed. I replaced it with a plain G that I had, thinking that I would get around to flashing it back to stock to see if that fixed the WAN port, but never got around to it. I wonder what the failure statistics on that GL WAN port are. I was originally thinking that the White Russian driver was abusing it somehow, but, If I'm picking up on your comments correctly, your failure happened with stock firmware. Is that so?
_______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
