On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Michael ODonnell <michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote: > I assume that, ideally, a 911 operator would like to > have a conversation with the caller to better assess the > nature/urgency of the emergency, but I also assume that's not > strictly necessary as long as location info is included in the > transmission, as obtained either via GPS or tower-triangulation.
That may be illegal. I don't know one way or the other, but there are rules against abuse of 911, and deliberately attaching a terminal without voice capability might qualify as abuse. I'm not even sure auto-dialers with recorded messages are legal. Might be fine, too. I dunno. I'd check, if I were you. -- Ben _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
