mike ledoux wrote: > > >I believe you are right; however, I don't believe that GNHLUG is in a >position to be making that kind of recommendation. After all, we've >never actually *used* any of these consultants, so what would we be >basing that recommendation on? Membership on a public mailing list? > >I think that having GNHLUG making recommendations could be very >problematic if a situation arises where the consultant's work is not >satisfactory to the client. > > > I doubt I can state with suitable emphasis the position that no way no how should GNHLUG ever suggest, list, recommend, infer, or do anything that gives rise to a belief that any consultant, supplier, or bottlewasher might be suitable or unsuitable for any task.
Ed Lawson _______________________________________________ Gnhlug-org mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org