I think he ment the `-l` switch for the df command. `df -l` and `df`
return identical info on my system. I don't have a RH5.2 box to use it
on to see if that is really what he ment. I'm still not sure how `ls -l`
returns disk space info for someone, though. For me, it retuns file
sizes, but not disk space.
Kenny
Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
> Ferenc Tamas Gyurcsan wrote:
> >
> > >Is '-l' supposed to work on Linux? It is an invalid option on RedHat 5.2
> Huh?
> ls -l has worked for me on every version of Linux and Unix I have ever used. It does
>not make any sense that 'ls -l' does not work. It sounds like the ls command is
>incorrectly aliased. The -l option has been part of the ls command forever.
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
