Greg Kettmann wrote:
> 
> Very good, I like it.
> 
> There's also another very big difference, from where I sit as a
> consultant.  A Business to Business connection usually has
> higher demands on capacity and reliability and thus the customer
> is more willing to pay for it, and for support.  The solutions
> to the desktop are usually not as mission critical or are being
> used to validate the technology and so a bit less critical and
> probably not as well funded.

Each can be equaly as critical, depending on the reasons that it is
deployed. For example, if a critical system goes down in the middle of
the night, and the VPN system is used by support people to fix the
problem, then the VPN becomes critical. 
 
> So far the following vendor's or products have been mentioned:
> http://www.freeswan.org/
> http://www.compatible.com/ (Intraport)
> http://www.uac.com/
> 
> With that in mind I need to qualify my original question.  There
> are VPN servers and VPN clients.  B2B generally implies two
> servers so compatibility is not an issue.  On the Business to
> Desktop compatibility is an issue.  Regardless of the server the
> question involves the client code.  Aventail and Nortel
> Contivity are both nice productes but neither supports a Linux
> client (as far as I know).  Also, it's usually pretty safe to
> say that any VPN server should have Windows client code.
> 
> So, I have the following questions about the above products.
> 
> I assume all of the above (I've looked through the sites but not
> extensively) are servers.

Yes. 

> Do they have Windows and Linux clients?

I know that the IntraPort from Compatible does (I use it, and it works
great!) AFAIK, Free S/wan doesn't. I'm not sure about UAC's PN7.

> Are they software (which we install) or prebuilt products?  (UAC
> and Intraport seem to be HW while freeswan seems to be software)
The servers are hardware (except for Free S/wan) and the clients are
software that you install on the remote system.
 
> How are these products supported?  (I would assume freeswan is a
> newsgroup type of support while the other two, as hardware
> products, would have standard support offerings).

You are correct in your assumptions here.
 
Kenny

**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************

Reply via email to