As far as I know, it always needed the full path....
At 02:03 PM 7/31/00 -0400, Cole Tuininga wrote:
>*laugh* Ok - this is just amusing.
>
>Trying out the Redhat 7.0 beta. Noticed that lpd no longer is in the
>"lpr" package so I was trying to find out what it was (so I could
>uninstall it). The following occurred:
>
>[root@(removed) etc]# rpm -qf ./rc.d/init.d/lpd
>file /rc.d/init.d/lpd: No such file or directory
>[root@(removed) etc]# cd rc.d/init.d
>[root@(removed) init.d]# rpm -qf ./lpd
>file /lpd: No such file or directory
>
>(*sigh*)
>
>[root@(removed) init.d]# rpm -qf `pwd`/lpd
>LPRng-3.6.21-8
>
>Is this just a bug in rpm 4?
>
>In other news, I'm very psyched that they've switched over to xinetd!
>8)
>
>--
>Out of my mind. Back in five minutes.
>
>Cole Tuininga
>Network Admin
>Code Energy, Inc
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(603) 766-2208
>
>**********************************************************
>To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
>*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
>unsubscribe gnhlug
>**********************************************************
----------------------
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
