In a message dated: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:53:50 EST
Cole Tuininga said:
>> So they evidently don't need a transaction-based DBMS?!
>
>Mysql .23 which is gamma (and currently the recommended download) has
>transaction support. And synchro support. *and there was much rejoicing*
Woohooo! I was unaware of that! Great news. How does it compare to
PostgreSQL performance wise?
>Now, if only they'd get subselects....
Hey, be happy with transactions for now, would ya ;)
--
Seeya,
Paul
----
I'm in shape, my shape just happens to be pear!
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
