On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 11:19:13AM -0400, Kenneth E. Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 11:06, Michael O'Donnell wrote: > > You're such losers - anybody can see that the > > vi-versus-emacs flamewar is by FAR superior to > > the Linux-distro one... > > I'm not a big fan of the 5 editor. And eMacs, well, isn't that Apple's > version of a networked toilet-seat looking laptop?? ;-)
Actually, "vi" would be 6 (so says me, Robert John Bell IV). Now "vim", OTOH, well, I'm not sure that's legitimate Roman numerals, but if I had to treat it as such, I suppose I'd call it 994 (that's 0x3E2, 01742, or 1111100010 for those of you who have been behind a keyboard too long). And yes, there really was no point to this email... -- Bob Bell Hewlett-Packard Company Software Engineer 110 Spit Brook Rd - ZKO3-3/U14 TruCluster Group Nashua, NH 03062-2698 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 603-884-0595 ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************