Le 07.06.2017 à 18:52, Jeffrey R. Carter a écrit : > If you're using Gnoga, the time to talk to the browser will swamp everything > else, so there's no reason to suppress checks. It is a lazy assumption. If the server side does image processing for instance, there is perhaps a good reason to suppress checks. The gain in response time and CPU usage will be significant. After all why does GNAT have more and more check suppressions ? It's certainly not for the fun of it... Perhaps it's due to actual customer requests ?...
I think that instead of pursuing philosophical debates, it would be better to organize a poll here or on c.l.a. about why people want to suppress checks. The results would be interesting. G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gnoga-list mailing list Gnoga-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnoga-list
