Hi Will,

Willie Walker wrote:
>>> I don't believe any of the users of IA2 or ATK or using STATE_SENSITIVE
>>> to mean anything other than STATE_ENABLED.
>>> For one, no one understands it. Second, it's not actually useful because
>>> if somethings greyed out it should not react to user input. As David
>>> Bolter says, the UI designer should be shot if a greyed out widget
>>> reacts to user input.
>>>
>>> I call to deprecate both STATE_SENSITIVE and STATE_ARMED.
>>>       
>
> We use STATE_SENSITIVE in Orca.  The thing I understand is as follows,
> though my understanding might be wrong because I'm not sure I've never
> fully understood the relationship between ENABLED and SENSITIVE:
>
> SENSITIVE means the thing is not grayed out.  For example, you can press
> a button.  It doesn't necessarily mean the application will do anything
> when you press the button, though.
>
> ENABLED means that if the thing is SENSITIVE, manipulating it will
> actually cause some sort of action in the application.  I'm not sure,
> but I think it is possible to have an ENABLED component that is not
> SENSITIVE.
>
> If this is correct, then SENSITIVE is more indicative of the visual GUI
> state and ENABLED merely indicates non-visual application state.  From
> an AT standpoint, I think SENSITIVE is the more practical state to look
> for whereas ENABLED is mostly intellectually interesting.
>   

So Orca does not care about STATE_ENABLED?  In gok we accept either 
sensitive _or_ enabled as worthy of providing access to for our users.  
In gok we have to err on that side though... as we are a different 
animal (non-aquatic actually).

D

> As such, if this were Sophie's choice, I'd choose to ditch ENABLED and
> keep our dear SENSITIVE child.
>
> Will
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
>   

_______________________________________________
Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel

Reply via email to