Hello William, Am Dienstag, den 12.06.2007, 09:14 -0400 schrieb Willie Walker: > I say sticking with something that matches given patterns and names > might be a good thing. How about just pyatspi? Maybe just including it > with libatspi and not making it a separate package would be another > alternative?
according to http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html number 2.2 packages have to have the 'python-...' prefix and I think they're easier discoverable with that. python-pyatspi (duplication of 'py'), python-libatspi? Any other ideas? Have a nice day, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
