Cspi was marked for deprecation and python bindings are preferred. I think your option b is the way to go. I can elaborate more on this if you want me to.
ariel 2009/2/16 Mike Gorse <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > As part of the Mono accessibility work that we are doing at Novell, we need > to implement the UIA client api and bridge from at-spi. This means that an > AT written in UIA should have access to applications exposing information > through atk. As I see it, we have two options for using at-spi in C# / > .net: > > (a) Use cspi, possibly writing a wrapper in C#, or > (b) write a native C# binding for the dbus-based at-spi. > > Can someone here explain the situation with cspi? I am under the impression > that its usage is sort of discouraged, but I am unsure as to why. Also, can > someone explain the reasons for replacing python at-spi with pyatspi? (I > believe the former was similar to option A, but its use is deprecated.) I'm > just trying to investigate / gather information before we make a decision on > how to proceed. > > Thanks, > -Mike G- > _______________________________________________ > Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel > _______________________________________________ Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
