Thank you very much for the link to the extensions. I'm working on updating
my version of GNOME so that I can use some of the extensions suggested.
That one will be especially helpful.

Since I wrote my statements on xmag, I have spent some time with the zoom
feature on the accessibility menu. Now that I've given it a good workout I
like it very much. Hopefully once I get the other things worked out, I can
get the residents together and show them how to use it. It is much simpler
than xmag, so I think I have a good chance.

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Piñeiro <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 01/14/2012 12:44 AM, Smitten wrote:
> > Thank you for your response, and for the links. Extremely helpful. I
> > hope I did this right. I sent to the list and to you. It's been a VERY
> > long time since I worked through lists. *grin*
> >
> > With reference to:
> >
> > >>. Instead of going to the Applications view, I think
> > is more sensible to configure the dash with your >>favorite applications
> >
> > How do you add applications to the dash which are not found in the
> > applications menu? For example, I have installed xmag for a few of the
> > users and I haven't found a way to add it to the dash. Drag and drop
> > from the folder didn't work. Trying to drag the icon to the dash while
> > the application was running didn't work. I have reverted to the old
> > desktop and added it there, but I would like to use it as intended. I
> > haven't tried GNOME Magnifier yet, as I have to install.
>
> Hi, I have just installed xmag and take a look. AFAIK, in order to add a
> application to the Dash the application needs to provide a .desktop
> file. And xmag doesn't provide it (for the same reason, xmag doesn't
> appear on the applications menu as you said). Anyway, I'm not sure who
> usually solves this, if the distro of the original developer.
>
> About GNOME Magnifier, in the case of GNOME 3 you don't need to install
> anything. GNOME 3 has a built-in magnifier. That means that it is not a
> different application, but the desktop itself can do the magnification.
> You can try it but pressing that accessibility icon at the top right
> corner, and activate Zoom. Unfourtunately, the configuration dialog is
> still not available, but planned to be added on the release at March.
> Anyway, it can be configured using the command line. I know that this is
> not ideal (you mentioned dconf-editor, but this is somewhat more
> low-level). So don't hesitate in asking specific commands.
>
> >
> >
> > With regards to:
> >
> > >>In fact, the GNOME design team has put special care to ensure that it
> > >>can be used by those who have a low level of pointer control, either
> > >>because they are not well practised at using pointing devices or our
> > >>software, because they might not have good control over the hand and
> > >>fingers, or because they are using low quality hardware.
> >
> > It takes more positioning of the mouse to navigate. Even if all you
> > have to do is hover, the difficulty is getting the mouse pointer in
> > position. If you increase the number of times, or increase the
> > distance, the mouse has to be repositioned, you increase the
> > difficulty of using your application for persons who have little
> > control. For example I can't even switch between desktops (with a
> > mouse) without first clicking on Activities, then moving to the
> > opposite side of the page to nudge the widow that contains the
> > desktops, and finally clicking on the desktop. Then I have to repeat
> > it all to get back. Formerly I just clicked once on a window in the
> > panel and I was there. There's an enormous amount of repositioning the
> > mouse! She can't use keyboard shortcuts! She only has two fingers
> > mobile on one hand. How can she press Ctrl, Alt, Tab? I found that one
> > under the heading "Accessibility" in one of the links you provided. I
> > think that's actually textbook for irony. *grin*
>
> Ctrl+Alt+Tab was also GNOME2 shortcut to set the keyboard focus on a
> different region of the desktop. For this same reason I agree with you
> that this is not a "accessibility switcher", it is just a utility dialog
> if you want to use the desktop without the mouse, that it is not your
> case (note to myself: contact that writer page to rewrite that).
>
> For the issue related with the desktop switching, there are a extension
> to do that. Just in case: GNOME 3 provides a easy way to developers to
> create custom extensions. This is the page:
>
> https://extensions.gnome.org/
>
> There are two different extensions to add a workspace switcher:
>
> https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/21/workspace-indicator/
> https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/3/bottom-panel/
>
> Although it is true that this doesn't solve the issues related to add a
> new desktop. In my personal case, I also miss the possibility of having
> some predefining desktops existing by default, instead of the current
> default 1. But this is just my personal taste.
>
>
> >
> > Responding to:
> >
> > >>And about the Applications view, the applications are grouped like in
> > >>the old way ...
> >
> > While you are correct that you still have "Accessories," "Games," etc
> > in the same old order, first you have to click on "Activities" then
> > you must click on "Applications" and finally you have to move your
> > mouse pointer to the opposite side of the screen to click on the set
> > you want. Once you do, you have to scroll through three screens to
> > access Tetravex for example, while the old way I only had to move my
> > mouse pointer about three inches on my little Netbook. I don't think
> > the designers have thought this through.
>
> As far as I remember, designers were mostly thinking on doing the search
> introducing some text. As you said, this is not really practical if you
> want to use only the mouse to launch an application.
>
> For this case, there is the option of a extension setting you a menu
> more similar to the one used at GNOME 2
>
> https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/6/applications-menu/
>
> >
> > Additionally, while I was specifically speaking about control, as B is
> > the person I'm most concerned about, there are many other problems
> > that must be overcome for nursing home residents. The designers have
> > made such a drastic change that the residents with memory issues are
> > going to have a difficult time.
> >
> > I made some specialty icons for the desktop. For example an 82 year
> > old preacher with Alzheimers is able to recognize the Bible on the
> > desktop. When he clicks that it takes him to a Web site that lets him
> > read and study the Bible, as he has for over 60 years. It's something
> > he remembers how to do, but only if he sees that icon.
>
> Yes you are right, I didn't realize that you can't add a launcher on the
> desktop itself (I never used too much that feature). Probably it would
> be easier to create an extension.
>
> Having said so, and after proof-read my mail. IMHO, asking an user to
> install and try 4 or 5 customs extensions are not practical. And at this
> moment, it can be problematic to install a extension if you don't have
> the specific desktop version. In the same way, if you need to add 4 or 5
> custom extensions this can be a sign that something is wrong. And most
> of your comments shows not only accessibility issues, but IMHO, also
> more general usability issues.
>
> >
> > I've overcome most of these issues, however I did it by reverting BACK
> > to the desktop. I am NOT able to use GNOME3 as it was intended to be
> > used.  Or rather I can (almost), although with more difficulty than
> > before, but the residents can't.
>
> This is a pity, and shows that there are still a lot of room for
> improvement. I hope that my comments would be useful somehow. Not sure
> if you need all the extensions, but taking into account your comments,
> probably the extension to have a GNOME2 applications menu could be useful.
>
> Thanks for the review and all the feedback.
>
> BR
>
> --
> Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
>
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel

Reply via email to