Thanks API and all for doing these meetings. Sorry I rarely get to attend meetings, so my opinions should not be taken too seriously.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Piñeiro <apinhe...@igalia.com> wrote: > > During the last meeting [1], we were discussing about the current > status of the weekly meetings, and we conclude that we need the input > of more people. So: > > 1. Timetable? We concluded that it wouldn't require to debate that, > as we have already discussed and tried several different > timetables. But just to confirm that. > I get very confused as to when meetings are, and it seems like the times accommodate European/Eastern hours better than Pacific hours, which is fine. What would really help me, is if we had an ICS or Google calendar with the meeting schedule for the next few months. UTC is also a confusing timezone. > 2. We still need weekly meeting? In some way this is somewhat a > overkill, and it is clear that due the timetable, there are some > meetings really empty. But, in the same way, if we made that > bi-weekly, due the timetable some people will just attend one > meeting per month. > > I haven't attended enough meetings to judge, if folks that hold it think it's worthwhile that's great. I think it is a bit overkill, but I am not really informed. > 3. Current format: perhaps the more problematic point on the > meeting. Some people felt that the current format is too detailed, > and that we should orient the meeting to an agenda-item-update. > > So, lets debate. > > Opinions? Debate? > > I will use this mail to share my personal opinions. > > 1. Ok for me > 2. I think that worths the weekly meeting. > > 3. I personally pointed on the previous meeting that the reason this > wouldn't work is that nobody is editing the shared weekly meeting > and proposing items. So if we find a meeting with just 2 items, we > have two options. Or a 10 minutes agenda-item-update a11y meeting, > or just use the time to talk about it, as, after all, we were there > to talk about it, and enter into detail if required. > > YES, probably a agenda-item-update oriented a11y meeting will be > better. Problem: there aren't enough items on the agenda for that. > > BR > > [1] http://live.gnome.org/Accessibility/Minutes/20100902 > > === > API (apinhe...@igalia.com) > _______________________________________________ > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list > gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list >
_______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
