On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 12:16 +1000, Bas Driessen wrote: > On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 08:49 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Are we set then for releasing 2.0.0? Any API change missing? > > > > I think it would be madness to jump to an API-stable release so quickly > > after so many recent API changes. > > > I kind of agree, but on the other hand it has been a while since there > has been an official stable libgda release. Also it is important for > other (GNOME) projects to have access to a new final API release, > since there are so many different releases around now in various Linux > distributions, that is becoming impossible to cater for that all. > mainly gnome-office, that's why we want to release 2.0 now. But yeah, I guess it is a risk to release it now, so let's wait a couple of weeks or so.
for the time being, I'm going to release 1.9.100 soon > Anyway, let's go with what we have and focus on a better 2.2.0 (or > whatever the next stable/frozen API will be). > yes, but we need to make sure we don't release a broken API in 2.0. -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list gnome-db-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
