On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:00 +0100, Gour wrote: > Rodrigo Moya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I don't see the point in adding those widgets, which means adding > > mostly all of libgda, to GTK. Database access is a specific thing, > > used only by specific applications, so having it in separate libraries > > makes much more sense to me than adding everything to one lib. > > I agree. Probably it is also more easy for devs to maintain. > > The inquiry was to know whether in providing libgda/libgnome bindings > for Haskell, one would 'stay' in or out of gtk, i.e. atm, gtk2hs project > covers about 90%, so adding more stuff into gtk would mean that writing > gnomedb bindings will 'push' the project to keep over 90% :-) > for the time being, haskell bindings should be out of GTK, if that's what you mean. -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
