On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:13 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > 2006/1/4, Daniel Espinosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'm waiting to have a new realice of gnome-db out of streets... are there > > any problem? are you there? any sustantial change? > > I don't think there is any problem for a 2.0 release. Rodrigo? > there a few API bugs in Bugzilla, which need to be solved. I haven't had any time at all, so if anyone wants to lend a hand, go to bugzilla.gnome.org :) If not, I don't think I'll be able to do anything in at least another week :(
> As for me I've been working on the merge of all the non graphical part > of libgnomedb into libgda (mainly the dictionary and the queries) and > an improvement of both libgda and libgnomedb APIs (better consistency > and ease of use). I'll upload all those changes into CVS when Rodrigo > has released 2.0. > do those changes break the 1.9.x API? If so, I wonder if we want to have those changes in 2.0 also, since breaking the API a lot again in 2.1.x would not be a good idea, IMO. > Whishing you and all the mailing list users a happy new year, > same for you :) -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
