Em Qui, 2006-10-19 às 16:36 +0200, Rodrigo Moya escreveu:
> On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 09:21 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> > On 10/18/06, Gustavo R. Montesino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Em Qua, 2006-10-18 às 18:23 +0200, Vivien Malerba escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > The API should now not change anymore until the 2.0 (that is of course
> > > > except if there is a problem with it such as name clashes,
> > > > inconsistencies, etc). The next releases will be API and ABI
> > > > compatible with the 2.0 which is why I want it as clean as possible.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Great. So, if anything change the soname will also be changed, right?
> > > Also, is there any good reason to the soname to be libgda-3.so.3.0.0
> > > instead of libgda-2.so.1.0.0?
> >
> > AFAIK libgda-2.so is used for version 1.2 of libgda and many
> > incompatible changes have gone into libgda so it's now libgda-3.so.
> >
> yeah, libgda-2.so is 1.2
>
> maybe we could change it to be libgda-2-0 for all 2.x releases, but I
> guess that adds to the confusion ("is it -2 or 2-0?")
Just using libgda-2.so.4 would be fine also.
_______________________________________________
gnome-db-list mailing list
gnome-db-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
