On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 21:18 +1000, Bas Driessen wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 11:02 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:16 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > > On 1/16/07, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The new libgda API is very large. I suspect that it's not all useful > > > > from applications. I guess that much of the API is only useful for > > > > implementing providers, and some might even be pure implementation. > > > > > Ehmmm .... Can we have the long anticipated official libgda 3.0 > release first please before any new overhauls and > refurbishments .... ;)
I am only talking about moving some files around, not changing the API. However, documenting it might be enough for me. The huge size of the (rather undocumented) API, which has changed a lot recently, is a big reason not to rush to libgda 3.0 unless we are completely OK with doing a parallel-installable libgda 4.0 when we discover the problems with it. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
