What do you think about to have a GdaApp object? You know about the "Easy GDA" functions, but they have the problem that when you call a function they create a GdaDict and update it each call, if I create a GdaApp it can holds this object and update it, then you don't need to create a new one and update it each time.
For example, you can call gda_add_row, with the GdaConnection object crated by gda_open_connection, then you can create a GdaApp using gda_app_new, and it will expects the same as in gda_open_connection parameters, creates the GdaConnection and assings to a new GdaDict object (this objects could be holded by the GdaApp one), then you will call gda_app_add_new with with the GdaApp pointer, then this function will use the GdaDict holded by GdaApp and not create a new one or update. 2007/2/12, Vivien Malerba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2/12/07, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:57 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > I'll do another tarball release of libgda and libgnomedb 3.0 soon, > > > unless there's any more changes that will be checked in soon. > > > > I just released the libgda and libgnomedb 2.99.4 tarballs. > > > > The NEWS entries are still long, but hopefully things are calming down > > now. > > > > They should... From my POV, I need to do those 3 things before a stable > release: > * correct the SQL parsers for some corner cases > * add support for formatting in strings and texts data entries > * add more tests when one runs "make check" > > Vivien > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list > -- Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación "de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (entrámite, pero para los cuates: LIBRE) _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
