On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:53 +0100, Foster, Gareth wrote: > > Maybe if I find something significant that is required and not mentioned I > will write it up. Using gconf (or gconfmm in my case) has been pretty > painless, but the schema side of things is a little more tricky.
In part it's just inherently confusing the way it works now. The biggest bang for the buck would be to fix up things to work in a simpler way. (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gconf/plans.html) Havoc _______________________________________________ gnome-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devel-list
