On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:36 +0200, Sascha Peilicke wrote: > Several blogs reacted on the derStandard.at interview with Marc Shuttleworth, > who mentioned the possibility for GNOME-3.x to be based on the Qt framework. > > First of all the relevant postings: > > http://derstandard.at/?url=/?id=3413801 > http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/07/16/itwire-shuttleworth-has-some-nice-words-for-kde/ > http://www.j5live.com/2008/07/16/flames-welcome-is-a-qt-gnome-desirable > > I think it's time to start a _serious_ discussion here, but please, pro's and > con's, no flaming and ranting without arguments.
I don't see how different that is from random guy off the street saying something about GNOME. I mean, sure, he can afford putting a downstream distro or a DVCS together, but setting direction for GNOME? Kidding me... Ok, if that's not clear enough, if someone does that, they may as well call it something else. -- behdad http://behdad.org/ "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 _______________________________________________ gnome-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devel-list
