Hi! I think Naba tried to send mail to all constributer to change license to LGPL but I don't know if he was fully successful.
Regards, Johannes Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2008, 17:48 +0100 schrieb Preben: > > As far as I understand gdl-dick*-files are released under LGPL! > > Sorry, not gnome-dick*-files, but gnome-dock*-files! > > > However, there is a dependency from these files to the file: > > libgdltypebuiltins.h, which again > > depends on gdl.h, which is released under GPL? > > > > The libgdltypebuiltins.h file is auto generated by some tool, so is it > > possible to not generate a > > dependency to gdl.h-file? > > > > gdl-switcher is released under the GPL, and not LGPL - is this an error? It > > seems to me, that the > > file is in fact only related to the gdl-dock-* files which are LGPL? > > This is very confusing! > > > > We are currently moving away from a qt-project due to license issues (we > > want it even more free). > > However these issues seem to repeat themselves, if we get stuck in GPL > > anyway with these docking > > widgets? > > > > Why is the whole library not LGPL? > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-devtools mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ gnome-devtools mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
