On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 09:40 +0200, Alex Launi wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Christopher James Halse Rogers > <[email protected]> wrote: > That would be my primary blocker. > The transition to git wouldn't have to affect us at all - the > bzr-git > plugin works well enough that we could simply ignore git > entirely. > > Not really- it doesn't support push.
True, but a little misleading; it *does* support dpush, which is basically the same thing but ends up rebasing your local tree against the thing you've just pushed. What it doesn't have at the moment is a reasonable way to deal with branches in git.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
