On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Christopher James Halse Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 21:47 +0200, Nicolas Chachereau wrote: > > Firstly, there's an overall goal here in reducing the current plugin > bottleneck. We've got *lots* of plugins, but in order for your swanky > new application to get supported in Do you additionally need to write a > Do plugin, get that merged into do-plugins, etc. > > The new architecture allows the application itself to provide the > functionality a Do plugin would provide.
This explains why the plugins I have written have not been added to do-plugins. Good show! I'm excited to see what you come up with. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GNOME Do" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gnome-do?hl=en.
