On Fri, 2005-25-02 at 07:42 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 14:57 +0900, Ryan McDougall wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-25-02 at 10:44 +1300, Glynn Foster wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > > As you know, the Sun docteam has been updating and creating > > > > documentation for the Sun release of the Java Desktop System. I have > > > > put > > > > the following tarballs in the gnome-docu/gdp/contrib/JDSR3 directory in > > > > CVS now if you want to use any of them for the upcoming GNOME release: > > > > > > It should be noted that JDS 3 will be based on GNOME 2.6. > > > > I may be totally out of line here, and if so don't hesitate to put me in > > my place, but wouldn't it be easier for both Sun and GNOME to work on > > patching documentation upstream, then branching from there for JDS > > specific releases instead of doing it the opposite way? > > I think you are out of line unless you're willing to help fix it. > > Read the archives, there was much discussion on the topic.
Contrary to what you imply, I have read the thread between you an Patrick Costello, and I was under the impression Sun's policy was at fault not Pat's team. I am willing to help fix it, not that I can affect Sun's internal policy, but I don't think thats what you meant. I'm all for less noise on the lists, but really I can't ask a simple and relevant question you yourself asked? Don't worry I'll show myself the door. > > Cheers, > Mark. > Cheers, Ryan _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
