All of this sounds fine to me. Having the GDP own the documents makes the most sense. I'll look into adding the bugzilla component.
-Alex Shaun McCance wrote: > On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 01:06 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just added the gnome-doc-utils boilerplate to Tomboy CVS. Please >> feel free to fix any bugs I've missed or to start contributing user >> manual content. > > Thanks Alex. What we need to know is if the GDP has control > over this document, or if you (or somebody else) will be the > maintainer for the documentation. Basically, do I and a few > other senior GDP members have blanket commit privileges? > > Also, it would be great to have a bugzilla component for the > documentation. Most modules use "docs", but "documentation", > "Documentation", and "help" are also common. (I'm trying to > think of a smart plan for these, but I haven't yet.) > > If and only if Tomboy's documentation is maintained by the > GDP, then we'd like the default assignee of that component > to be [EMAIL PROTECTED] The default QA > contact can be whatever you want. Some maintainers use > the -maint alias of their product so they can watch the > documentation bugs. > > -- > Shaun > > _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
