It is really Danilo's and the i18n team's call. That said, particularly on the horrendous misspelling, it would be nice if it went in :)
Luis (who really thinks we should spell-check all .po files automatically after every commit, and keeps waiting for someone to give tinderbox the code to do that ;) On 8/13/05, Adam Weinberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I jumped the gun and committed a string change without any approval > whatsoever (except from the module maintainer). Danilo asked me to > back out the change, and I'm perfectly willing to do so. But before > I do, I wanted to see whether I can get the string change approved > to remain in rather than backing it out. > > The change is outlined in Bug #301133. It does two things: it changes > an instance of "xml" to "XML", and changes "configurion" to > "configuration". The changes are small enough that they shouldn't > mess up any translator efforts, and they're important enough that it'd > be really good to have them in 2.12 rather than shipping with > misspellings. > > I know that this is un-Kosher (and Danilo gave me a whipping; I've > learned my lesson here), but I'd rather see these changes go into > 2.12 than have to back them out. > > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.vectors.cx > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n